US Rep Mike Coffman made more statements this past weekend regarding the Pinon Canyon expansion - primarily that enlarging the little used maneuver site will be an 'economic benefit for Aurora and Colorado Springs'. Yet even he admits there are other locations that can be used for training our troops that they already own.
Read the Post story on it along with the almost 30 responses.
Read the Pueblo Chieftain letter to the editor on agriculture, water and land.
It's also important to note that the area he represents has a very high concentration of defense contractors - from Boeing to Northrup Grumman.
Seems his efforts to push the expansion through are against the majority of other Republicans and Democrats in the state. It's not the partisan issue he is trying to spin it into.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(99)
-
▼
May
(24)
- Kay Bailey Hutchison remarks
- It's about convenience
- Mr. Coffman: take from the poor to give to the rich
- Bill Signing used to create more fear
- Cancellation
- Article in Colo Springs Bus Journal and ResponseC
- Geren admits training available now (outside of PCMS)
- Colorado Springs Reps staffers protestors?
- 'Dozen Protestors' constitutes being 'besieged'?
- Suggestions of intimidation are 'side show' effort...
- KRDO - Governor Ritter to pass HB1317
- Doug Holdread Editorial rebuttal for Denver Post
- Pinon Canyon Expansion Opposition Coalition: Repre...
- Representatives Salazar and Markey continue valian...
- They promised what they can't deliver
- Lamborn contradictions
- Gazette letter to the editor
- Governor waffling on signing HB1317
- CPR story link
- Colorado Public Radio story on Pinon Canyon
- Scott McInnis - voted out before he gets out of th...
- Geren says Congressional Ban doesn't effect Army
- Army tries to say we're 'imagining things'
- Our future is our kids
-
▼
May
(24)
No comments:
Post a Comment